Incident
incident:doe_vs_mukasey
Also: Doe v. Mukasey
Later stage of the NSL litigation in which the suppression of speech was declared unconstitutional, subject to a stay.
Later stage of the NSL litigation in which the suppression of speech was declared unconstitutional, subject to a stay.
“this case was renamed to Doe vs. Mukasey”
“The judge declared the suppression of speech to be unconstitutional”
| Direction | Predicate | Other entity | Origin | EP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| outgoing | ASSOCIATED_WITH | National Security Letter Provision | Explicit | 176 |
Doe vs. Mukasey ASSOCIATED_WITH National Security Letter Provision
In the later appeal, the judge again found the suppression of speech unconstitutional but stayed the ruling; the account presents this as a continuation of the NSL challenge.
Explicit Confidence 97% · Jack Rhysider EP 176 Details
“this case was renamed to Doe vs. Mukasey”
“The judge declared the suppression of speech to be unconstitutional, but again, the judge issued a stay”