Episode
EP 54 — NotPetya
24 December 2019
Official episode
·
Official transcript
advanced persistent threat
The episode examines the 2017 NotPetya destructive worm, its propagation through MeDoc, the use of Mimikatz and EternalBlue, its global impact, and attribution to Russian military-linked operators.
Topics: Destructive malware posing as ransomware, Worm propagation and lateral movement, Windows credential dumping with Mimikatz, SMB exploitation with EternalBlue, Software-update supply-chain compromise through MeDoc, Domain controller and backup destruction, Cyber-war and nation-state attribution, Critical infrastructure and global supply-chain disruption, Windows authentication weaknesses, Incident response and large-scale network recovery
Official episode-page sources
Links published on the Darknet Diaries episode page. Not LLM output.
Entities (40)
Claims (23)
Qualified statements from this episode, not graph facts.
Andy Greenberg
AUTHORED
Sandworm
Andy Greenberg says he is the author of the book Sandworm.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“I’m Andy Greenberg and I’m a senior writer for Wired Magazine and I’m the author of this book, Sandworm.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 2065–2169
Mimikatz
DEVELOPED_BY
Benjamin Delpy
Benjamin Delpy built Mimikatz to extract usernames and passwords from memory.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“He built a tool to extract this username and password to display it to anyone who wants to see it. That tool he made is called Mimikatz”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 5235–5371
NotPetya
USES
Mimikatz
The episode says the hackers used Mimikatz to obtain credentials and help the worm spread through networks.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“the hackers used a tool called Mimikatz”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 4295–4334
NotPetya
USES
EternalBlue
The worm used EternalBlue as an additional way to enter unpatched computers.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“another tool was added to this worm, something called EternalBlue”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 8023–8088
EternalBlue
EXPLOITS
SMB vulnerability
EternalBlue exploited a vulnerability in the Server Message Block function.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“EternalBlue which exploited a vulnerability in a Windows function called Server Message Block”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 8651–8744
SMB vulnerability
AFFECTS
Server Message Block
The vulnerability EternalBlue exploited was in the Windows Server Message Block function.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“EternalBlue which exploited a vulnerability in a Windows function called Server Message Block”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 8651–8744
NotPetya
INVOLVES
EternalBlue
The episode describes EternalBlue being used by the NotPetya worm to spread to computers without stolen passwords.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“if it couldn’t login like that, it would then try to use EternalBlue to see if that system was unpatched and exploit it that way”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 10626–10754
NotPetya
VARIANT_OF
Petya
NotPetya was initially thought to be Petya, but further research identified it as a new strain; the name NotPetya stuck.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“It was originally thought to be Petya but some additional research went into it and found this is a new strain. It was not Petya.”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 16549–16679
NotPetya
USES
ransomware
The episode says ransomware was used as the destructive mechanism, even though the attackers were not believed to be seeking money.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“Their goal was to destroy computers and ransomware was just the perfect tool to do that.”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 6913–7001
NotPetya
TARGETS
Ukraine
The stated target was Ukraine, including its businesses and government agencies, with the goal of taking down as many Ukrainian computers as possible.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“the target of this attack was Ukraine and the goal was to take out as many computers as possible in Ukraine; businesses, government agencies, doesn’t matter.”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 11135–11292
NotPetya
TARGETS
Linkos Group
The attackers selected Linkos Group and its MeDoc update infrastructure as the initial point for targeting Ukraine.
Explicit
Confidence 96%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“They ultimately chose to target a small company called Linkos Group.”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 11622–11690
NotPetya
USES
MeDoc
NotPetya was distributed by hijacking MeDoc's update mechanism and pushing malware through it.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“they hijacked MeDoc’s update mechanism to push out their own malware. Everyone everywhere in the world who had MeDoc installed suddenly has NotPetya”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 12721–12870
NotPetya
INVOLVES
supply-chain compromise
The incident used a supply-chain compromise involving the MeDoc software update mechanism.
Derived
Confidence 96%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“they hijacked MeDoc’s update mechanism to push out their own malware”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 12721–12789
NotPetya
TARGETS
Oschadbank
NotPetya hit approximately ninety percent of Oschadbank's computers and shut down its systems.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“Around ninety percent of all of the computers in Oschadbank had been hit with this mysterious ransomware worm.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 14770–14880
NotPetya
TARGETS
Maersk
NotPetya infected and severely disrupted Maersk's global network and operations.
Explicit
Confidence 99%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“That was all that it took for Maersk’s entire global network to be infected.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 24885–24961
NotPetya
TARGETS
FedEx
FedEx was among the western companies hit by NotPetya.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“That included FedEx, Maersk, the world’s largest [00:20:00] shipping firm, Merck”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 17957–18037
NotPetya
TARGETS
Merck
Merck was among the multinational companies infected by NotPetya.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“That included FedEx, Maersk, the world’s largest [00:20:00] shipping firm, Merck”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 17957–18037
NotPetya
ATTRIBUTED_TO
Sandworm
ESET's forensic evidence tied NotPetya to earlier attacks against Ukraine that had been tied to Sandworm.
Attributed
Confidence 91%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“ESET had started to pull together forensic evidence that tied NotPetya to the earlier waves of attacks against Ukraine”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 42310–42428
“Those attacks, in turn, had been tied to this group Sandworm.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 42588–42649
NotPetya
ATTRIBUTED_TO
Russia
The White House and the other Five Eyes intelligence agencies publicly attributed NotPetya to Russia, specifically saying it was deployed by the Russian military against Ukraine.
Attributed
Confidence 99%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“the White House put out a statement, a very, very short statement that just said yes, NotPetya was the worst cyber-attack in history and it was deployed by the Russian military against Ukraine”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 44190–44382
“The US, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the UK all simultaneously called out Russia as the perpetrator of NotPetya.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 44566–44685
NotPetya
ATTRIBUTED_TO
GRU
The Washington Post was credited with reporting before the official announcement that NotPetya was carried out by the GRU.
Attributed
Confidence 90%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“the Washington Post who, in a story before that announcement, said simply that NotPetya was carried out by the GRU.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 46075–46190
Sandworm
POSSIBLY_SAME_AS
Fancy Bear
The episode presents Sandworm and Fancy Bear as possibly the same group, but explicitly says this is not known.
Uncertain
Confidence 98%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“It might be the same group as Fancy Bear. We don’t know.”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 47032–47089
Sandworm
ASSOCIATED_WITH
GRU
The episode presents the belief that Sandworm and Fancy Bear were hacking groups working for Russia's GRU, while acknowledging uncertainty about the exact relationship.
Uncertain
Confidence 85%
· Jack Rhysider
EP 54
Details
“what we believe is that both Sandworm and Fancy Bear are hacking groups both working for Russia’s GRU in Moscow.”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 47238–47350
NotPetya
RELATED_TO
wiper
Incident responders and security researchers characterized NotPetya as a destructive wiper posing as ransomware rather than genuine ransomware.
Explicit
Confidence 98%
· Andy Greenberg
EP 54
Details
“It was a destructive worm posing as ransomware.”
Andy Greenberg ·
offsets 16238–16285
“security researchers were suggesting that this isn’t a ransomware; it’s a wiper”
Jack Rhysider ·
offsets 32693–32772
Transcript references
Works mentioned in the transcript. Distinct from show-note sources.
Sandworm
book · Andy Greenberg
Cyber War
book · Richard Clarke
ESET report on NotPetya
article · ESET
Washington Post story on NotPetya and the GRU
article · Washington Post
andygreenberg.net
website · Andy Greenberg
Shadow Brokers
podcast · Darknet Diaries
Extraction provenance
Model gpt-5.6-luna · prompt 1.5.19 · schema 1.5.19
· 2026-09-12T17:16:13.211741+00:00